CVE Explorer

CVE-2025-9630

The WP SinoType plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sinotype_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Lifecycle PUBLISHED1 preserved revisionFact urn:baitaphish:canonical-cve-fact-revision:v2:ea75e530a74ab830d2f2c1070216deee57aaa3ae1030475fb097fdfe219c043e

Known exploited

Not asserted

Disputed

Stale source

Conflicts

Affected products and versions

1 source assertion

{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"WP SinoType","vendor":"samueljesse","versions":[{"lessThanOrEqual":"1.0","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"}]}

cve_program_cvelist_v5affected
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/affected/0

Provider-owned CVSS observations

1 source assertion

{"metric":{"baseScore":4.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"metric_type":"cvssV3_1"}

cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/metrics/0/cvssV3_1

CWE assertions

1 source assertion

{"cweId":"CWE-352","description":"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}

cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Source references

3 source assertions

{"url":"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-sinotype/trunk/sinotype.php#L161"}

cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/references/2

{"url":"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-sinotype/trunk/sinotype.php#L65"}

cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/references/1

{"url":"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/b02198f5-10df-4c4c-beed-aec8acacaec9?source=cve"}

cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:9755b5ebedcecd9aee358b77e525dfe6c8072e32f5d5610087c570a2f15e53d4 · sha256:b055dfc39a739bd2… · /containers/cna/references/0

Attribution and limitations

CVE Program CVEList V5: Reproduce the MITRE copyright designation and CVE license in copies. Source →

Provider severity values are preserved separately. Baitaphish does not convert them into a risk rating, infer affected products, or treat EPSS as observed exploitation.

← Back to CVE Explorer