Known exploited
Not asserted
Disputed
No
Stale source
No
Conflicts
1

Preserved source conflicts

No provider value was silently selected as the winner.

cwe · 2 assertions

{"cweId":"CWE-426","description":"CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/1/descriptions/0

{"cweId":"CWE-345","description":"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Affected products and versions

1 source assertion
{"product":"rtk","vendor":"rtk-ai","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 0.32.0"}]}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5affected
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/affected/0

Provider-owned CVSS observations

1 source assertion
{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"LOCAL","baseScore":6.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","subIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","userInteraction":"ACTIVE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH"},"metric_type":"cvssV4_0"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/metrics/0/cvssV4_0

CWE assertions

2 source assertions
{"cweId":"CWE-426","description":"CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/1/descriptions/0
{"cweId":"CWE-345","description":"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Source references

4 source assertions
{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/adp/0/references/0
{"name":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/references/1
{"name":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/references/2
{"name":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories/GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories/GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:b56a6ba7222cba91663256b6f790f22facb4ae2e62383c7e90403bee76ed99c4 · sha256:1b3dbc3fa8897c0d… · /containers/cna/references/0

Attribution and limitations

  • CVE Program CVEList V5: Reproduce the MITRE copyright designation and CVE license in copies. Source →

Provider severity values are preserved separately. Baitaphish does not convert them into a risk rating, infer affected products, or treat EPSS as observed exploitation.