Baitaphish
Security intelligence
SearchLatest briefing
CVE Explorer

CVE-2026-46620

e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5.
Lifecycle PUBLISHED1 preserved revisionFact urn:baitaphish:canonical-cve-fact-revision:v2:a655850a32b505b6d4edb5a5e9af47c8f44d2508a143c409bbab4866a2685f09
Known exploited
Not asserted
Disputed
No
Stale source
No
Conflicts
1

Preserved source conflicts

No provider value was silently selected as the winner.

cwe · 2 assertions

{"cweId":"CWE-352","description":"CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/1/descriptions/0

{"cweId":"CWE-285","description":"CWE-285: Improper Authorization","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Affected products and versions

1 source assertion
{"product":"e107","vendor":"e107inc","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 2.3.5"}]}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5affected
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/affected/0

Provider-owned CVSS observations

1 source assertion
{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":6.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"REQUIRED","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"},"metric_type":"cvssV3_1"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/metrics/0/cvssV3_1

CWE assertions

2 source assertions
{"cweId":"CWE-352","description":"CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/1/descriptions/0
{"cweId":"CWE-285","description":"CWE-285: Improper Authorization","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Source references

2 source assertions
{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/adp/0/references/0
{"name":"https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:6457f7e1e63e8f745ffacc2ccc4752b79a78c4bdc2a47aba964e843546474e39 · sha256:ec9df2136a958735… · /containers/cna/references/0

Attribution and limitations

  • CVE Program CVEList V5: Reproduce the MITRE copyright designation and CVE license in copies. Source →

Provider severity values are preserved separately. Baitaphish does not convert them into a risk rating, infer affected products, or treat EPSS as observed exploitation.

← Back to CVE Explorer