Known exploited
Not asserted
Disputed
No
Stale source
No
Conflicts
1

Preserved source conflicts

No provider value was silently selected as the winner.

cvss · 2 assertions

{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.7,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"LOW","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH"},"metric_type":"cvssV4_0"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/metrics/0/cvssV4_0

{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":8.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L","version":"3.1"},"metric_type":"cvssV3_1"}

  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/metrics/1/cvssV3_1

Affected products and versions

1 source assertion
{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","packageURL":"pkg:npm/better-auth/scim","product":"scim","vendor":"better-auth","versions":[{"lessThan":"1.7.0-beta.4","status":"affected","version":"1.5.0","versionType":"semver"},{"status":"unaffected","version":"1.7.0-beta.4","versionType":"semver"}]}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5affected
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/affected/0

Provider-owned CVSS observations

2 source assertions
{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.7,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"LOW","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH"},"metric_type":"cvssV4_0"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/metrics/0/cvssV4_0
{"metric":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":8.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L","version":"3.1"},"metric_type":"cvssV3_1"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cvss
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/metrics/1/cvssV3_1

CWE assertions

1 source assertion
{"cweId":"CWE-639","description":"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5cwe
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/problemTypes/0/descriptions/0

Source references

3 source assertions
{"name":"GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-j8v8-g9cx-5qf4)","tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-j8v8-g9cx-5qf4"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/references/0
{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-j8v8-g9cx-5qf4"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/adp/0/references/0
{"name":"VulnCheck Advisory: better-auth SCIM 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass","tags":["third-party-advisory"],"url":"https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-scim-before-beta-4-authorization-bypass"}
  • cve_program_cvelist_v5reference
    urn:baitaphish:normalized-source-record:v2:0354c1bad377e2486196f48c8b1dfe14f4cc61567d33a0a5f3b8465e5c7283f6 · sha256:934e7eb8cf449a8c… · /containers/cna/references/1

Attribution and limitations

  • CVE Program CVEList V5: Reproduce the MITRE copyright designation and CVE license in copies. Source →

Provider severity values are preserved separately. Baitaphish does not convert them into a risk rating, infer affected products, or treat EPSS as observed exploitation.