Supporting Artifact Evaluation with LLMs: A Study with Published Security Research Papers
2026-03-10T07:23:35Z•cae030af0e2e09c2dde3847b231222a389ddc3e373ab2697bb72549d2f3d964d
CPSIoTLLM-assisted reproducibilitySSDISSETFMXACMLartifact evaluationaudio-visual modelsbreak-the-glassconsent-based access controlcryptographic agilitydeep-learning side-channeleBPFhealthcare identity managementmAVEpatient privacypost-quantum cryptographysearchable symmetric encryptionself-sovereign identityside-channelsystem-level leakagetemporal attacktext-to-video jailbreakwatermarking
What happened
This collection summarizes recent security and privacy research (multiple arXiv submissions) across reproducibility, identity, cryptography, ML-safety, and systems leakage. Key contributions include: an LLM-based artifact-evaluation toolkit that rates reproducibility (≈72% accuracy), autonomously prepares sandboxed execution for ~28% of runnable artifacts, and detects methodological pitfalls with F1>92%; a temporal jailbreak (TFM) for text-to-video models that converts unsafe prompts into sparse two-frame prompts to increase jailbreak success (up to +12%); discovery of system-level leakage for
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_cr
- Record identifier
- cae030af0e2e09c2dde3847b231222a389ddc3e373ab2697bb72549d2f3d964d
- Enrichment time
- 2026-03-10T07:23:35Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.