Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities
2026-07-30T07:23:44Z•6382ee65e2c6bf4b16731a30c1aad8c8f472352b8eaa1e754d3d7c91f3a5524a
AI governanceAI safetyAI securityLLM biasaccountabilityadversarial pressureagentic AIautonomous research agentscybersecuritydata governancedata sovereigntyeducational AIfrontier AIhuman-computer interactionprovenancepsychometric reliabilitytechnical assurancetrustworthy AIverification
What happened
Collection of recent arXiv research on AI safety, security, governance, reliability, bias, accountability, and human impacts. The most security-relevant work proposes a field-wide AI security agenda covering frontier-system and infrastructure protection, technical assurance, cybersecurity, public-private coordination, and governance of agentic AI under adversarial pressure. Related papers examine verification gaps in autonomous science, attribution and accountability failures in agent-mediated collaboration, anticipatory data governance, and risks from biased or poorly calibrated LLM behavior.
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_cy
- Record identifier
- 6382ee65e2c6bf4b16731a30c1aad8c8f472352b8eaa1e754d3d7c91f3a5524a
- Enrichment time
- 2026-07-30T07:23:44Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.