A Counterfactual Approach for Addressing Individual User Unfairness in Collaborative Recommender System
2026-03-17T08:52:14Z•53b90cc38a2de9e06a72226f832d605edd77da3c353a716c86855a13d1a33a8f
GraphRAGLLM-retrievalNepaliOpenExtractQLoRAboolean-matrix-factorizationcollaborative-filteringcounterfactualdatasetsdense-retrievaldistillationevaluation-benchmarksfairnesshallucination-mitigationhypergraphknowledge-graphlate-interactionlow-resource-NLPmultimodal-retrievalpersonalized-learningpreference-alignmentquery-expansionquery-rewritingrecommender-systemssystematic-review-automation
What happened
Collection of recent arXiv papers (March 17, 2026) across information retrieval, recommender systems, and LLM applications. Key contributions include: a counterfactual method to mitigate per-user unfairness in collaborative recommenders (introducing synthetic interactions and evaluation on MovieLens/Amazon); an empirical study showing prompt-only LLM query rewriting has domain-dependent effects on dense retrieval and risks reducing lexical alignment; techniques to suppress domain-specific hallucination for regulatory technical standards using QLoRA fine-tuning and GraphRAG with a Neo4j KG (not
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_ir
- Record identifier
- 53b90cc38a2de9e06a72226f832d605edd77da3c353a716c86855a13d1a33a8f
- Enrichment time
- 2026-03-17T08:52:14Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.