When to Use Wireless Challenge-Response Physical Layer Authentication: Design of a Measurable Guideline for OFDM
2026-05-11T07:23:49Z•c43521649755470638411e1a5ba195e723df91098ec7e61077fc7487e4ca8df0
6G6G governanceAquamanBGPBIERDilithiumFalconGDPR compliance`,`ISACKyberMDLGOFDMQKDhandshake reliabilityharvest-now-decrypt-latermap-and-encapmulti-path key fragmentationphysical-layer authenticationpost-quantum cryptographyprivacyquantum-resiliencerandomness testingrouting scalabilitytransparent proxywireless security
What happened
Collection of recent networking and security research. Key contributions include: a new Maximum Differential Likelihood Generator (MDLG) adversary that exploits correlated OFDM subchannel responses and a measurable randomness-testing guideline for when physical-layer challenge–response authentication (PLA) is safe; an experimental evaluation of NIST-selected post-quantum cryptography (Kyber, Dilithium, Falcon) showing ciphertext/signature expansion harms handshake reliability and edge bandwidth; Aquaman, a transparent-proxy architecture for quantum-resilient session-key establishment (multi‑/Q
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_ni
- Record identifier
- c43521649755470638411e1a5ba195e723df91098ec7e61077fc7487e4ca8df0
- Enrichment time
- 2026-05-11T07:23:49Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.