Test-Input Generation for Tensor Programs: What Actually Finds Kernel Bugs
2026-06-29T08:51:47Z•70ab7dadf604b2e6430041130cbaf59e05e72cf3db6ef85137f0315e546357aa
Bash-generationGUI-testingGenAI-educationLLM-for-codeNaN-InfVue.jsaccessibilityautoregressive-diffusionbenchmarkingcode-retrievalformal-grammarsfuzzinggpu-kernel-bugsprofiling-and-resourcesrobustnesssoftware-world-modelsspeculative-refinementtensor-kernelstest-case-selectiontest-input-generation
What happened
Collection of recent arXiv CS/SE papers (June 29, 2026) covering testing, robustness, and evaluation in software and ML systems. Key security-relevant findings: for tensor/GPU kernels, boundary-only shape sampling found 78% of seeded kernel bugs with 0% false positives while adversarial value sampling reached 99% recall but produced widespread false positives by injecting NaN/Inf inputs; this suggests test-input choices materially affect bug discovery and spurious failure signals. Other notable papers survey GenAI pedagogy using Bloom's taxonomy, systematic use of formal grammars in BPM, large
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_se
- Record identifier
- 70ab7dadf604b2e6430041130cbaf59e05e72cf3db6ef85137f0315e546357aa
- Enrichment time
- 2026-06-29T08:51:47Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.