Faster Code, Deeper Debt? A Multivocal Literature Review on Technical Debt and Its Early Signs in LLM-Assisted Software Development
2026-06-16T08:51:45Z•7faf0107d733e389411c46ab571d77a58c22ea26495bf524f160baf06a939e9a
AI reliabilityLLM-assisted developmentagentic developmentassurance casesautomotive diagnosticsfast-integration debtformal program analysisgovernance debtprompt debtprovenance debtsoftware supply chainspecification languagestechnical debttrace debuggingzero-replay prediction
What happened
Collection of recent SE/AI papers highlighting security-relevant risks and mitigations when integrating LLMs into software development. Key findings: LLM-assisted coding amplifies traditional technical debt (code, design, docs) and introduces new LLM-specific debts (fast-integration, prompt, data, provenance, ethical, governance) that increase maintenance and security exposure; there are no standard LLM-specific metrics or benchmarks yet. Several papers propose mitigations with direct security relevance: human-in-the-loop controls, prompt engineering, provenance and data-quality alignment, and
Why it matters
A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.
Evidence and limitations
- Source ID
- arxiv_cs_se
- Record identifier
- 7faf0107d733e389411c46ab571d77a58c22ea26495bf524f160baf06a939e9a
- Enrichment time
- 2026-06-16T08:51:45Z
- AI-assisted enrichment
- Yes
This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.