Bayesian Latent Space Models for Graphs Are Misspecified: Toward Robust Inference via Generalized Posteriors

2026-05-20T07:23:58Z544a3f3de4490af9026f6c434b91e8c892e05d87b6c51baf632f256f05a79446
bayesian-inferenceconformal-predictiondiffusion-modelsgeneralized-posteriorgenerative-modelsgraph-modelsheavy-tailed-distributionshigher-order-langevininformation-processing-capacitylagrangian-relaxationlatent-space-modelslink-predictionmachine-learningmarkov-chainsmemorizationmilpmodel-misspecificationoptimizationphase-type-distributionsphotonic-computingsgd-streaming','causal-discovery','dag-clustering','non-gaussianstochastic-gradient-ascentstructure-selectiontensor-networkstransported-beta

What happened

Collection of recent ML/theory papers (arXiv 20 May 2026) covering robust inference for graph latent-space models (showing misspecification causes overconfidence and proposing a generalized posterior — Link-Sequential R-SafeBayes), heavy-tail generation limits of Gaussian/Lipschitz decoders and a Phase-Type (Markov chain) decoder solution, a transported-Beta-law view of split conformal prediction with finite-sample bounds, data‑driven Lagrangian relaxation for MILP with minimax/generalization rates and SGA optimality, a Dual-Channel Tensor Neural Network (low-rank + sparse refinement) with non

Why it matters

A reviewed impact interpretation has not been published for this record.

Evidence and limitations

Source ID
arxiv_stat_ml
Record identifier
544a3f3de4490af9026f6c434b91e8c892e05d87b6c51baf632f256f05a79446
Enrichment time
2026-05-20T07:23:58Z
AI-assisted enrichment
Yes

This record may overlap with other records. Its enrichment can be incomplete or wrong, and machine assistance was used. Validate consequential decisions against the linked source and your own environment.