An unofficial architecture decision guide aligned to the current SAP-C02 domain scope.
Exam code SAP-C02 · Scope SAP-C02 · Reviewed
How to use this guide
SAP-C02 assumes two or more years designing and implementing AWS solutions. The useful unit of study is an architecture decision under constraints, not a catalog of services.
Practice identifying the requirement that dominates: organizational boundary, recovery objective, migration dependency, operational burden, security, performance, or cost.
Official domain map
D1 · 26%
Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity
Network connectivity
Security controls
Reliability and resilience
Multi-account environments
Cost visibility
D2 · 29%
Design for New Solutions
Deployment strategy
Business continuity
Security controls
Reliability
Performance
Cost optimization
D3 · 25%
Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions
Operational excellence
Security
Performance
Reliability
Cost optimization
D4 · 20%
Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization
Select workloads
Choose migration approaches
Design target architecture
Identify modernization opportunities
Emerging technologies may appear as unscored content. Keep that separate from the scored domain weights and do not distort the core plan around guessed pretest items.
The same AWS service can be correct or wrong depending on recovery objectives, ownership boundaries, change tolerance, throughput, consistency, compliance, and operating model.
Device-local diagnostic
Mark domains that need review
These selections stay in this browser. They are not an exam score and are never sent to Baitaphish.
No domains currently marked.
Diagnostic
Given one architecture, produce a requirement hierarchy, current-state risk list, target decision, migration sequence, rollback path, and cost/operations tradeoff.
Requirement extraction
Multi-account design
Reliability
Migration sequencing
Operational excellence
Cost reasoning
Shared foundations
These subjects are maintained once across the certification library; this guide applies them through its own domain lens.
Secure architecture
Reason about trust boundaries, resilience, data flows, network controls, and security tradeoffs before selecting products.
Identity and access
Explain authentication, authorization, federation, lifecycle controls, and least privilege across organizational and cloud boundaries.
Risk and governance
Translate business context, policy, legal duties, control ownership, and evidence into defensible risk decisions.
Operations and incident response
Connect telemetry, triage, containment, recovery, change, and continuous improvement to measurable outcomes.
Data protection and cryptography
Choose controls for classification, lifecycle, encryption, keys, secrets, privacy, retention, and defensible deletion.
Delivery and assurance
Build testing, software lifecycle, deployment, evaluation, audit, and evidence practices into normal delivery work.
Study sequence and reusable assets
Organizations and connectivity
Design account, identity, network, DNS, and governance boundaries.
Organizational complexity cases: Choose account, connectivity, identity, and governance boundaries.
New solution tradeoffs
Select resilient, secure, performant, operable, and cost-aware patterns.
New solution design drills: Rank conflicting requirements and defend one architecture.
Improve the estate
Diagnose existing solutions using observability, change safety, scaling, and cost evidence.
Continuous improvement review: Use evidence to find the next safe improvement.
Migration and modernization
Sequence discovery, dependency treatment, data movement, cutover, rollback, and modernization.
Migration and modernization tabletop: Plan dependencies, movement, validation, cutover, and rollback.
Common misconceptions
“Professional-level questions are solved by choosing the most capable service.”
The best design satisfies the stated constraints with acceptable operational complexity, migration risk, resilience, security, and cost.
“A multi-Region design is always more reliable.”
It can add data-consistency, failover, testing, quota, cost, and operational failure modes; map it to explicit recovery and availability requirements.
“Migration ends when data is copied.”
Discovery, dependency mapping, validation, cutover, rollback, operations, and modernization determine whether the business transition succeeds.
Seven-day experienced review sprint
Experienced AWS architect with recent design responsibility and seven days for synthesis.
Day 1 — Diagnostic and multi-account, identity, network, DNS, and governance boundaries.
Day 2 — Reliability, recovery objectives, data consistency, decoupling, and failure drills.
Day 3 — Security, encryption, access paths, deployment safety, and compliance constraints.
Day 4 — Performance, scaling, caching, quotas, observability, and operational burden.
Day 5 — Cost attribution, commitment, storage lifecycle, transfer, and architecture tradeoffs.
Day 6 — Migration discovery, data movement, cutover, rollback, and modernization cases.
Day 7 — Timed scenarios; review only repeated constraint and sequencing errors.
Longer study path
Architect building professional-level breadth over eight to twelve weeks.
Baseline the four domains with architecture narratives, not flash-card recall.
Build one reference design each for multi-account foundations, resilient applications, analytics, and hybrid connectivity.
Run weekly failure and migration tabletop exercises with explicit objectives and rollback.
Review existing workloads for measurable improvements in security, reliability, performance, operations, and cost.
Complete timed mixed-domain cases and classify every error by missed requirement, constraint, dependency, or tradeoff.
Exam logistics
Confirm current AWS exam delivery, timing, language, identification, pricing, and rescheduling details before booking.
Expect long scenarios with distractors; identify the explicit requirement and constraint before evaluating services.
This unofficial guide is not affiliated with or endorsed by AWS and contains no recalled exam content.